Win, Win, Win?
| Article Index |
|---|
| Win, Win, Win? |
| Productivity activity |
| Impacts and conclusions |
| All Pages |
Page 1 of 3
Productivity, Lean and Garment Workers’ Wages and Working conditions
by Liz Parker for Women Working Worldwide, Central American Women’s Network and Labour Behind the Label
Adapted from a Powerpoint presentation
Summary of conclusions
A rights based perspective
- Changes to business processes that may impact on wages and working conditions should be measured by their effectiveness in delivering positive outcomes for workers, and in mitigating negative outcomes.
- Employers must ensure that where they exist, trade unions are fully consulted with regard to any changes in the workplace.
- Focus of activities should be on:
- Payment of a living wage to workers for a normal working week
- Provision of safe and hygienic working environments
- Entering into stable, formal employment relationships with workers
- Respect for workers’ right to freedom of association and collective bargaining
- How this is done is a matter for brands / retailers to decide, along with worker representatives.
- Therefore there is a question about whether labour rights organisations engage with this debate.
Outline of report
- Background to the research
- Productivity activity
- Impact on garment workers
- Conclusions
1. Background to the research
Initial impetus for this research
- In response to pressure to ensure workers are paid a living wages, UK brands/retailers began to implement productivity related projects.
- Women Working Worldwide, Labour Behind the Label and Central American Women’s Network had concerns these projects would not lead to a living wage and that they could lead to negative impacts on workers.
However, there was
- Very little information about what is meant by productivity and what the implications are for workers;
- Little engagement from labour rights organisations.
Methodology: desk based research, surveys and interviews with brands and retailers, labour rights organisations and donors in 2009 and 2010
Last Updated (Wednesday, 09 February 2011 09:24)






